We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Kirin 9000 vs A17 Pro SoCs by
Hisilicon and Apple
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 900041
A17 Pro94
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 900036
A17 Pro95
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 900086
A17 Pro89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 900054
A17 Pro93
SoC
Kirin 9000
VS
A17 Pro
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Kirin 9000
A17 Pro
CPU
194527
399992
GPU
280796
620081
Memory
146761
265579
UX
140303
346005
Total score
762387
1631657
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect
Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences
Pros of Apple A17 Pro
A17 Pro has
20.77%
higher CPU clock speed than
Kirin 9000 (3780 vs
3130 MHz).
A17 Pro has
83.95%
higher GPU clock speed than
Kirin 9000 (1398 vs
760 MHz).
A17 Pro has
16.36%
higher memory frequency than
Kirin 9000 (3200 vs
2750 MHz).
A17 Pro has
25%
smaller sized transistor than
Kirin 9000 (3 vs
4 nm).
A17 Pro has
114.02%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Kirin 9000 (1,632 K vs
762 K ).
A17 Pro has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Kirin 9000.
A17 Pro Support
16.36%
higher memory bandwidth than
Kirin 9000 (51.2 vs
44 GB/s).