Menu

78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Kirin 9000

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Dimensity 8200
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Dimensity 8200

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Dimensity 8200 SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Dimensity 8200 43
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Dimensity 8200 40
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Dimensity 8200 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Dimensity 8200 56
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Dimensity 8200
CPU 194527 210639
GPU 280796 339646
Memory 146761 139322
UX 140303 160894
Total score 762387 850501
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 0.97% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 8200 (3130 vs 3100 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8200.

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 132.73% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9000 (6400 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 11.56% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 9000 (851 K vs 762 K ).
  • Dimensity 8200 Support 16.36% higher memory bandwidth than Kirin 9000 (51.2 vs 44 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Dimensity 8200 1054

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Dimensity 8200 4010

3DMark

31%
Kirin 9000
Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
N/A
Dimensity 8200
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+ Adaptive support
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
     1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A -
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB 4 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G610 MC6
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz -
  • Execution units 24 6
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.2
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 6400 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB -
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core)
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6E
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Hisilicon Kirin 9000
CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Mediatek Dimensity 8200
CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote