Kirin 9000 Vs Helio G85
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Helio G85 SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000
- Kirin 9000 has 56.50% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G85 (3130 vs 2000 MHz).
- Kirin 9000 has 52.78% higher memory frequency than Helio G85 (2750 vs 1800 MHz).
- Kirin 9000 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G85 (4 vs 12 nm).
- Kirin 9000 has 206.46% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G85 (762 K vs 249 K).
- Kirin 9000 Support 228.11% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G85 (44 vs 13.41 MHz).
Pros of MediaTek Helio G85
- Helio G85 has 31.58% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (1000 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
CPU | 194527 | 67123 |
GPU | 280796 | 61260 |
Memory | 146761 | 42828 |
UX | 140303 | 77565 |
Total score | 762387 | 248776 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression | - | 81.2 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | - | 11.9 images/s |
Speech recognition | - | 24.2 words/s |
Machine learning | - | 18.1 images/s |
Camera shooting | - | 9.26 images/s |
HTML 5 | - | 1.55 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | - | 413.5 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
47%
Kirin 90005%
Helio G85Score: 6040
Stability | 54% | - |
Graphics test | 36 FPS | 4 FPS |
Score | 6040 | 710 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Hisilicon Kirin 9000 and MediaTek Helio G85Display
Max On-Device Display | - | - |
Max On-Display Resolution | - | 2520 x 1080 |
Max External Display | - | - |
HDR | - | - |
Color Depth | - | - |
Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
83%
Kirin 900053%
Helio G85
Processor Speed (Frequency)
Architecture |
1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77 3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77 4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55 |
2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75 6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Base Frequency | 2050 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Turbo Frequency | 3130 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
L1 cache | 64 KB | - |
L2 cache | 0.512 MB | - |
L3 cache | 4 MB | - |
Process | 4 nm | 12 nm |
Transistor count | 15.3 Billion | - |
TDP | 4 W | 5 W |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali-G78 MP24 | Mali-G52 MP2 |
Architecture | Valhall 2 | Bifrost 2 |
GPU frequency | 760 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Execution units | 24 | 2 |
Shading units | 384 | 32 |
FLOPS | 1076 Gigaflops | 59 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.0 |
OpenCL version | 2 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
Memory type | LPDDR5 | LPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 2750 MHz | 1800 MHz |
Bus | 4x16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 44 Gbit/s | 13.41 Gbit/s |
Max size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
Neural processor (NPU) | AI accelerator | Neural Engine |
Storage type | UFS 3.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
Video capture | 4K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 2K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Modem | Balong 5000 | - |
4G support | LTE Cat. 24 | LTE Cat. 7 |
5G support | Yes | No |
Peak Download speed | Up to 7168 Mbps | - |
Peak Upload speed | Up to 2560 Mbps | - |
Wi-Fi | 6 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 5.2 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
Announced Date | October 2020 | April 2020 |
Class | Flagship | Mid range |
Model number | - | MT6769Z |
Official page | Kirin 9000 official site | Helio G85 official site |