78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 41
Helio G95 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 36
Helio G95 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 54
Helio G95 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Helio G95
CPU 194527 91718
GPU 280796 91234
Memory 146761 58340
UX 140303 59442
Total score 762387 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 9000

  • Kirin 9000 has 52.68% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (3130 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 28.93% higher memory frequency than Helio G95 (2750 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Kirin 9000 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Kirin 9000 has 153.51% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (762 K vs 301 K).

Pros of Mediatek Helio G95

  • Helio G95 has 18.42% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (900 vs 760 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Kirin 9000
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

83%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

93%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 24 4
  • Shading units 384 64
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDRLPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

CPU
41%
GPU
36%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote