Menu

53

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Kirin 9000

81

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400

Exynos 2400
Overview - Kirin 9000 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9000 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Hisilicon and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9000 39
Exynos 2400 83
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9000 35
Exynos 2400 74
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9000 86
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9000 53
Exynos 2400 81
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9000 Exynos 2400
CPU 194527 510545
GPU 280796 587630
Memory 146761 322132
UX 140303 260123
Total score 762387 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 2.56% higher CPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (3210 vs 3130 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 32.76% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9000 (1009 vs 760 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 52.73% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9000 (4200 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 120.42% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 9000 (1,680 K vs 762 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9000.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 1054
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9000 3724
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

31%
Kirin 9000
Stability 54%

Graphics test 36 FPS
N/A
Exynos 2400
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - -
  • Max On-Display Resolution - -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3130 MHz

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

51%
Base Frequency

2050 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.13 GHz Cortex-A77
    3x 2.54 GHz Cortex-A77
    4x 2.05 GHz Cortex-A55
     1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache 64 KB -
  • L2 cache 0.512 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 15.3 Billion -
  • TDP 4 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G78 MP24 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 760 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 24 -
  • Shading units 384 -
  • FLOPS 1076 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) AI accelerator Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 25MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 7168 Mbps 9640 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2560 Mbps 2550 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 9000

Hisilicon Kirin 9000
CPU
39%
GPU
35%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2400
CPU
83%
GPU
74%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote