55

Points
HiSilicon Kirin 9010

60

Points
Google Tensor G3
Overview - Kirin 9010 Vs Tensor G3

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 9010 vs Tensor G3 SoCs by and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 12-core and 9-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 9010 53
Tensor G3 50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 9010 37
Tensor G3 45
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 9010 75
Tensor G3 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 9010 55
Tensor G3 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 9010 Tensor G3
CPU 305156 281756
GPU 197179 364449
Memory 266091 148341
UX 201408 181913
Total score 969834 976459
Key Differences

Pros of Google Tensor G3

  • Tensor G3 has 26.52% higher CPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (2910 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 18.67% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (890 vs 750 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 52.73% higher memory frequency than Kirin 9010 (4200 vs 2750 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 42.86% smaller sized transistor than Kirin 9010 (4 vs 7 nm).
  • Tensor G3 has 0.68% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 9010 (976 K vs 970 K ).
  • Tensor G3 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9010.
  • Tensor G3 Support 45.45% higher memory bandwidth than Kirin 9010 (64 vs 44 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9010 1442
Tensor G3 1626

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 9010 4471
Tensor G3 3598

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display - 4K
  • Max On-Display Resolution - 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

57%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

72%
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

38%
Base Frequency

1550 MHz

42%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
    4x 1.55 GHz – TaiShan V121
    6x 2.18 GHz – Cortex-A510
    1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
    4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 12 9
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Maleoon 910 Mali-G715 MP7
  • Architecture Maleoon Valhall 4th gen
  • GPU frequency 750 MHz 890 MHz
  • Execution units - 7
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 2415.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version - 1.3
  • OpenCL version - 2.0
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2750 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 44 Gbit/s 64 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Da Vinci Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem Balong 5000 Exynos 5300i
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 24 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4600 Mbps 7300 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps 3700 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

HiSilicon Kirin 9010

CPU
53%
GPU
37%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Google Tensor G3

CPU
50%
GPU
45%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote