Kirin 970 Vs Helio G95
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 970 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Hisilicon and Mediatek respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 970
- Kirin 970 has 15.12% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2360 vs 2050 MHz).
- Kirin 970 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (10 vs 12 nm).
- Kirin 970 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G95 (1200 vs 600 MHz).
Pros of Mediatek Helio G95
- Helio G95 has 5.88% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 970 (900 vs 850 MHz).
- Helio G95 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Kirin 970 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
- Helio G95 has 2.30% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 970 (301 K vs 294 K ).
- Helio G95 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 970.
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
CPU | 77046 | 91718 |
GPU | 90560 | 91234 |
Memory | 66398 | 58340 |
UX | 59977 | 59442 |
Total score | 293981 | 300734 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
Image compression | 76.9 Mpixels/s | 96.2 Mpixels/s |
Face detection | 14 images/s | 14.6 images/s |
Speech recognition | 24.5 words/s | 31.1 words/s |
Machine learning | 21.8 images/s | 26.4 images/s |
Camera shooting | 11.4 images/s | 13.8 images/s |
HTML 5 | 1.46 Mnodes/s | 1.97 Mnodes/s |
SQLite | 417.7 Mnodes/s | 444.9 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
8%
Kirin 97011%
Helio G95Score: 1464
Stability | 80% | 98% |
Graphics test | 6 FPS | 8 FPS |
Score | 1050 | 1464 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Hisilicon Kirin 970 and Mediatek Helio G95Display
Max On-Device Display | 4K @ 60 Hz | Full HD+ @ 90Hz |
Max On-Display Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max External Display | - | - |
HDR | HDR, HDR-10 | HDR10+ |
Color Depth | - | - |
Color Gamut | - | - |
CPU
62%
Kirin 97054%
Helio G95
Processor Speed (Frequency)
Architecture |
4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex A73 4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex A53 |
2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
Cores | 8 | 8 |
Base Frequency | 1840 MHz | 2000 MHz |
Turbo Frequency | 2360 MHz | 2050 MHz |
Instruction set | ARMv8-A | ARMv8.2-A |
L1 cache | - | - |
L2 cache | 0.5 MB | - |
L3 cache | 2 MB | - |
Process | 10 nm | 12 nm |
Transistor count | 5.5 Billion | - |
TDP | 9 W | 5 W |
Graphics
GPU name | Mali G72 MP12 | Mali-G76 3EEMC4 |
Architecture | Bifrost | Bifrost |
GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 900 MHz |
Execution units | 12 | 4 |
Shading units | 192 | 64 |
FLOPS | 347 Gigaflops | 195.8 Gigaflops |
Vulkan version | 1.0 | 1.1 |
OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDRLPDDR4X |
Memory frequency | 1866 MHz | 2133 MHz |
Bus | 4x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
Max bandwidth | 29.8 Gbit/s | - |
Max size | 8 GB | 10 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
Neural processor (NPU) | Dedicated NPU | Da Vinci |
Storage type | UFS 2.1 | eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 |
Max display resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 2520 x 1080 |
Max camera resolution | 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP | 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP |
Video capture | 4K at 30FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video playback | 4K at 60FPS | 4K at 30FPS |
Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, VC-1 | H.264, H.265, VP9 |
Audio codecs | 32 bit@384 kHz, HD-audio | AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Modem | - | - |
4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 12 |
5G support | No | No |
Peak Download speed | - | - |
Peak Upload speed | - | - |
Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
Bluetooth | 4.2 | 5.0 |
Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
Announced Date | September 2017 | September 2020 |
Class | Flagship | Mid range |
Model number | Hi3670 | MT6785V/CD |
Official page | Kirin 970 official site | Helio G95 official site |