78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 970

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400
Overview - Kirin 970 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 970 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Hisilicon and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 970 15
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 970 12
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 970 64
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 970 30
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 970 Exynos 2400
CPU 77046 510545
GPU 90560 587630
Memory 66398 322132
UX 59977 260123
Total score 293981 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 36.02% higher CPU clock speed than Kirin 970 (3210 vs 2360 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 18.71% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 970 (1009 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 125.08% higher memory frequency than Kirin 970 (4200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 60% smaller sized transistor than Kirin 970 (4 vs 10 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 471.61% better AnTuTu 9 score than Kirin 970 (1,680 K vs 294 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 970.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 970 390
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 970 1361
Exynos 2400 6895

Image compression

icon
Kirin 970 76.9
Exynos 2400

Face detection

icon
Kirin 970 14
Exynos 2400

Speech recognition

icon
Kirin 970 24.5
Exynos 2400

Machine learning

icon
Kirin 970 21.8
Exynos 2400

Camera shooting

icon
Kirin 970 11.4
Exynos 2400

HTML 5

icon
Kirin 970 1.46
Exynos 2400

SQLite

icon
Kirin 970 417.7
Exynos 2400

3DMark

Stability 80%

Graphics test 6 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 60 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 3840 x 2160 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR, HDR-10 -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2360 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

84%
Base Frequency

1840 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex A73
    4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex A53
    1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 0.5 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 10 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 5.5 Billion -
  • TDP 9 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali G72 MP12 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Bifrost Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 12 -
  • Shading units 192 -
  • FLOPS 347 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.0 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 29.8 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Dedicated NPU Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, VC-1 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs 32 bit@384 kHz, HD-audio AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support No Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 4.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 970

CPU
15%
GPU
12%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
64%

Samsung Exynos 2400

CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote