We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released
Kirin 970 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by
Hisilicon and Samsung
respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these
8-core
and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and
3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Features
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 97015
Exynos 240088
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 97012
Exynos 240076
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 97064
Exynos 240086
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 97030
Exynos 240083
SoC
Kirin 970
VS
Exynos 2400
Benchmarks
AnTuTu 9
Kirin 970
Exynos 2400
CPU
77046
510545
GPU
90560
587630
Memory
66398
322132
UX
59977
260123
Total score
293981
1680430
Key Differences
Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400
Exynos 2400 has
36.02%
higher CPU clock speed than
Kirin 970 (3210 vs
2360 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
18.71%
higher GPU clock speed than
Kirin 970 (1009 vs
850 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
125.08%
higher memory frequency than
Kirin 970 (4200 vs
1866 MHz).
Exynos 2400 has
60%
smaller sized transistor than
Kirin 970 (4 vs
10 nm).
Exynos 2400 has
471.61%
better AnTuTu 9 score than
Kirin 970 (1,680 K vs
294 K ).
Exynos 2400 has latest
instruction set,
hence better than
Kirin 970.