78

Points
Hisilicon Kirin 970

78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Kirin 970 Vs Tiger T700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Kirin 970 vs Tiger T700 SoCs by Hisilicon and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Kirin 970 15
Tiger T700 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Kirin 970 12
Tiger T700 9
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Kirin 970 64
Tiger T700 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Kirin 970 30
Tiger T700 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Kirin 970 Tiger T700
CPU 77046 67140
GPU 90560 43026
Memory 66398 44785
UX 59977 58416
Total score 293981 213367
Key Differences

Pros of Hisilicon Kirin 970

  • Kirin 970 has 29.67% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (2360 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Kirin 970 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (10 vs 12 nm).
  • Kirin 970 has 37.78% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (294 K vs 213 K).
  • Kirin 970 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Tiger T700 (1200 vs 300 MHz).

Pros of Unisoc Tiger T700

  • Tiger T700 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 970.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Kirin 970 390
Tiger T700 355

Multi-Core Score

icon
Kirin 970 1361
Tiger T700 1349

Image compression

icon
Kirin 970 76.9
Tiger T700 83.2

Face detection

icon
Kirin 970 14
Tiger T700 9.85

Speech recognition

icon
Kirin 970 24.5
Tiger T700 23.9

Machine learning

icon
Kirin 970 21.8
Tiger T700 18.5

Camera shooting

icon
Kirin 970 11.4
Tiger T700 9.6

HTML 5

icon
Kirin 970 1.46
Tiger T700 1.37

SQLite

icon
Kirin 970 417.7
Tiger T700 421.8

3DMark

Stability 80%

Graphics test 6 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 4K @ 60 Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 3840 x 2160 2160 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR, HDR-10 -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2360 MHz

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

84%
Base Frequency

1840 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.36 GHz – Cortex A73
    4x 1.84 GHz – Cortex A53
    2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache 0.5 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 10 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 5.5 Billion -
  • TDP 9 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali G72 MP12 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Bifrost Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 12 2
  • Shading units 192 32
  • FLOPS 347 Gigaflops 54.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.0 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 11
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 1866 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 29.8 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 8 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Dedicated NPU Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 3840 x 2160 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 48MP, 2x 20MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9, VC-1 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs 32 bit@384 kHz, HD-audio AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - LTE Cat. 7
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 No
  • 5G support No -
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 4.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Hisilicon Kirin 970

CPU
15%
GPU
12%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
64%

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote