Overview - Dimensity 1050 Vs Dimensity 9400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1050 vs Dimensity 9400 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1050 22
Dimensity 9400 91
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1050 17
Dimensity 9400 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1050 79
Dimensity 9400 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1050 39
Dimensity 9400 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1050 Dimensity 9400
CPU 137500 600293
GPU 159729 1194784
Memory 96303 408283
UX 129591 443652
Total score 523123 2647012
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400

  • Dimensity 9400 has 45.2% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (3630 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 61.20% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 1050 (1612 vs 1000 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 66.66% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 1050 (5333 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 1050 (3 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 406.00% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1050 (2,647 K vs 523 K ).
  • Dimensity 9400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 1050.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 745
Dimensity 9400 2876

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 2142
Dimensity 9400 8972

3DMark

Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Stability 18674%

Graphics test 56 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @144 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

90%
Turbo Clock Speed

3630 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

59%
Base Frequency

2400 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.63 GHz – Cortex-X925
    3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 12 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 8.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC3 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1612 MHz
  • Execution units 3 -
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 7428 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 5333 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - -
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 MediaTek NPU 890
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4600 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed 2770 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - -
  • 4G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

CPU
22%
GPU
17%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 9400

CPU
91%
GPU
94%
Memory
62%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote