78

Points
MediaTek Helio G37
Overview - Dimensity 1050 Vs Helio G37

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1050 vs Helio G37 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1050 27
Helio G37 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1050 22
Helio G37 8
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1050 79
Helio G37 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1050 43
Helio G37 26
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1050

  • Dimensity 1050 has 8.70% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (2500 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 47.06% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (1000 vs 680 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (3200 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 276.80% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (523 K vs 139 K).
  • Dimensity 1050 Support 823.33% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G37 (2770 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 745
Helio G37 914

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 2142
Helio G37 178

3DMark

Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @144 Hz Full HD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2400 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

61%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 2.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC3 IMG PowerVR GE8320
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Rogue
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 680 MHz
  • Execution units 3 2
  • Shading units - 64
  • FLOPS - 56 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

memory-frequency

Memory frequency

3200 MHz
memory-frequency

Memory frequency

1600 MHz
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

-
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

13.9 Gbit/s
memory-frequency

Max Size

16 GB
memory-frequency

Max Size

8 GB

  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 No
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2400 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

4G Speed
  • 2770 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 1250 Mbps
    Upload Speed
  • 300 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 150 Mbps
    Upload Speed
5G Speed
  • 4600 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • -
    Upload Speed
  • -
    Download Speed
  • -
    Upload Speed

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Helio G37

CPU
14%
GPU
8%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote