78

Points
MediaTek Helio G85
Overview - Dimensity 1050 Vs Helio G85

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1050 vs Helio G85 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1050 27
Helio G85 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1050 22
Helio G85 10
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1050 79
Helio G85 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1050 43
Helio G85 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1050 Helio G85
CPU 137500 67123
GPU 159729 61260
Memory 96303 42828
UX 129591 77565
Total score 523123 248776
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1050

  • Dimensity 1050 has 25.00% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G85 (2500 vs 2000 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 77.78% higher memory frequency than Helio G85 (3200 vs 1800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G85 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 110.28% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G85 (523 K vs 249 K).
  • Dimensity 1050 Support 823.33% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G85 (2770 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 745
Helio G85 361

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 2142
Helio G85 1279

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 81.2

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 11.9

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 24.2

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 18.1

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 9.26

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 1.55

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 1050
Helio G85 413.5

3DMark

Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test 4 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @144 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC3 Mali-G52 MP2
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 3 2
  • Shading units - 32
  • FLOPS - 59 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1800 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 13.41 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Helio G85

CPU
14%
GPU
10%
Memory
21%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote