Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Dimensity 1050

78

Points
Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Snapdragon 778G Plus
Overview - Dimensity 1050 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1050 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1050 27
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1050 22
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1050 79
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1050 43
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1050 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 137500 166382
GPU 159729 177972
Memory 96303 106394
UX 129591 130486
Total score 523123 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1050

  • Dimensity 1050 has 81.82% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (1000 vs 550 MHz).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has 11.11% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1050 (581 K vs 523 K ).
  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 1050.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 745
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1050 2142
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

13%
Dimensity 1050
Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
14%
Snapdragon 778G Plus
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @144 Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 2 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC3 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture Valhall 3 Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 1000 MHz 550 MHz
  • Execution units 3 2
  • Shading units - 384
  • FLOPS - 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 550 Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Mediatek Dimensity 1050
CPU
27%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote