78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Dimensity 1080 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1080 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1080 28
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1080 22
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1080 79
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1080 43
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1080 Exynos 850
CPU 143941 47291
GPU 140125 21386
Memory 96692 40704
UX 136066 22040
Total score 516824 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1080

  • Dimensity 1080 has 15.85% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (950 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1080 has 71.49% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (3200 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1080 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 1080 has 293.26% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (517 K vs 131 K).
  • Dimensity 1080 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1080 766
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1080 2252
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 1080
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @120Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 256 KB -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 820 MHz
  • Execution units 5 6
  • Shading units 64 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 27 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 No
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1080

CPU
28%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote