78

Points
Google Tensor
Overview - Dimensity 1100 Vs Tensor

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1100 vs Tensor SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1100 28
Tensor 36
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1100 25
Tensor 34
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1100 79
Tensor 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1100 44
Tensor 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1100 Tensor
CPU 143843 181161
GPU 205643 294446
Memory 109699 103174
UX 107424 145388
Total score 566609 724169
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1100

  • Dimensity 1100 has 0.24% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor (850 vs 848 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1100 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Tensor (4266 vs 3200 MHz).

Pros of Google Tensor

  • Tensor has 7.69% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 1100 (2800 vs 2600 MHz).
  • Tensor has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 1100 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Tensor has 27.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 1100 (724 K vs 567 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1100 655
Tensor 1026

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1100 2500
Tensor 2879

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 1100 134
Tensor

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 1100 34.1
Tensor

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 1100 62.2
Tensor

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 1100 57.1
Tensor

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 1100 30.2
Tensor

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 1100 1.95
Tensor

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 1100 990.4
Tensor

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 26 FPS
Stability 56%

Graphics test 37 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @144Hz 4k, FHD+ @ 60 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

9%
Base Frequency

200 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-X1
    2x 2.25 GHz – Cortex A76
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 3 MB
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 5.6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G78 MP20
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 848 MHz
  • Execution units 9 20
  • Shading units 144 320
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDRLPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Tensor Processing Unit
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 5G-integrated modem Exynos 5300g
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1100

CPU
28%
GPU
25%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Google Tensor

CPU
36%
GPU
34%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote