Overview - Dimensity 1300 Vs Snapdragon 778G Plus

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1300 vs Snapdragon 778G Plus SoCs by Mediatek and Qualcomm respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1300 37
Snapdragon 778G Plus 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1300 32
Snapdragon 778G Plus 26
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1300 79
Snapdragon 778G Plus 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1300 49
Snapdragon 778G Plus 46
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1300 Snapdragon 778G Plus
CPU 181145 166382
GPU 240476 177972
Memory 122105 106394
UX 127295 130486
Total score 671021 581234
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1300

  • Dimensity 1300 has 20.00% higher CPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (3000 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1300 has 54.55% higher GPU clock speed than Snapdragon 778G Plus (850 vs 550 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1300 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Snapdragon 778G Plus (4266 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1300 has 15.45% better AnTuTu 9 score than Snapdragon 778G Plus (671 K vs 581 K).

Pros of Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

  • Snapdragon 778G Plus has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 1300.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1300 975
Snapdragon 778G Plus 816

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1300 3294
Snapdragon 778G Plus 2971

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 28 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test 16 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @168 Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - 4K @ 60 Hz
  • HDR HDR, HDR10 HDR10+, HDR10
  • Color Depth - Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut - Rec. 2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

66%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

86%
Base Frequency

1900 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 2.5 GHz – Kryo 670 Prime (Cortex-A78)
    3x 2.2 GHz – Kryo 670 Gold (Cortex-A78)
    4x 1.9 GHz – Kryo 670 Silver (Cortex-A55)
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.4-A
  • L1 cache 256 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G77 MC9 Adreno 642L
  • Architecture Valhall Adreno 600
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 550 MHz
  • Execution units 9 2
  • Shading units 144 384
  • FLOPS - 845 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4266 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 34.1 Gbit/s 25.6 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Hexagon 770
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 192MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - X53
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1300

CPU
37%
GPU
32%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G Plus

CPU
33%
GPU
26%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote