78

Points
Unisoc Tiger T700
Overview - Dimensity 1300 Vs Tiger T700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 1300 vs Tiger T700 SoCs by Mediatek and Unisoc respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 1300 37
Tiger T700 14
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 1300 32
Tiger T700 9
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 1300 79
Tiger T700 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 1300 49
Tiger T700 27
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 1300 Tiger T700
CPU 181145 67140
GPU 240476 43026
Memory 122105 44785
UX 127295 58416
Total score 671021 213367
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1300

  • Dimensity 1300 has 64.84% higher CPU clock speed than Tiger T700 (3000 vs 1820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1300 has 128.62% higher memory frequency than Tiger T700 (4266 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1300 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Tiger T700 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 1300 has 214.49% better AnTuTu 9 score than Tiger T700 (671 K vs 213 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1300 975
Tiger T700 355

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 1300 3294
Tiger T700 1349

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 83.2

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 9.85

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 23.9

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 18.5

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 9.6

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 1.37

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 1300
Tiger T700 421.8

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 28 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @168 Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2160 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR, HDR10 -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

48%
Turbo Clock Speed

1820 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

83%
Base Frequency

1820 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A75
    6x 1.82 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 256 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 10 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G52 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall Bifrost 2
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 9 2
  • Shading units 144 32
  • FLOPS - 54.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.0
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 11
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 4266 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 34.1 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 6 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2160 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - LTE Cat. 7
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 No
  • 5G support Yes -
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 1300

CPU
37%
GPU
32%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Unisoc Tiger T700

CPU
14%
GPU
9%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote