Menu

35

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 6020

Dimensity 6020

51

Points
HiSilicon Kirin 9010

Kirin 9010
Overview - Dimensity 6020 Vs Kirin 9010

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 6020 vs Kirin 9010 SoCs by Mediatek and respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 12-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 6020 17
Kirin 9010 46
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 6020 12
Kirin 9010 31
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 6020 75
Kirin 9010 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 6020 35
Kirin 9010 51
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 6020 Kirin 9010
CPU 105422 305156
GPU 84018 197179
Memory 82373 266091
UX 101844 201408
Total score 373657 969834
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 6020

  • Dimensity 6020 has 26.67% higher GPU clock speed than Kirin 9010 (950 vs 750 MHz).
  • Dimensity 6020 has latest instruction set, hence better than Kirin 9010.

Pros of HiSilicon Kirin 9010

  • Kirin 9010 has 4.55% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 6020 (2300 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Kirin 9010 has 28.93% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 6020 (2750 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Kirin 9010 has 159.55% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 6020 (970 K vs 374 K ).
  • Kirin 9010 Support 157.76% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 6020 (44 vs 17.07 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 6020 569
Kirin 9010 1442

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 6020 1728
Kirin 9010 4471

3DMark

0%
Dimensity 6020
Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A
Kirin 9010
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120Hz/90Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

57%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

38%
Base Frequency

1550 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.3 GHz – TaiShan V121
    4x 1.55 GHz – TaiShan V121
    6x 2.18 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 12
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Maleoon 910
  • Architecture Valhall Maleoon
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 750 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 44 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 12 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Balong 5000
  • 4G support Yes LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps 4600 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 6020

Mediatek Dimensity 6020
CPU
17%
GPU
12%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

HiSilicon Kirin 9010

HiSilicon Kirin 9010
CPU
46%
GPU
31%
Memory
32%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote