Overview - Dimensity 6080 Vs Dimensity 9400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 6080 vs Dimensity 9400 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 6080 22
Dimensity 9400 91
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 6080 14
Dimensity 9400 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 6080 79
Dimensity 9400 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 6080 38
Dimensity 9400 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 6080 Dimensity 9400
CPU 135946 600293
GPU 69519 1194784
Memory 103763 408283
UX 121897 443652
Total score 431125 2647012
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9400

  • Dimensity 9400 has 51.25% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 6080 (3630 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 69.68% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 6080 (1612 vs 950 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 150.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 6080 (5333 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 6080 (3 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9400 has 513.98% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 6080 (2,647 K vs 431 K ).
  • Dimensity 9400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 6080.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 6080 778
Dimensity 9400 2876

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 6080 2075
Dimensity 9400 8972

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 18674%

Graphics test 56 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

90%
Turbo Clock Speed

3630 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

59%
Base Frequency

2400 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.63 GHz – Cortex-X925
    3x 3.3 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB 12 MB
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 6 W 8.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G925 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture Valhall 1st gen Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 1612 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 64 192
  • FLOPS 243.2 Gigaflops 7428 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.2
  • DirectX version - 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 5333 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek NPU 890
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 6080

CPU
22%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 9400

CPU
91%
GPU
94%
Memory
62%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote