Overview - Dimensity 700 Vs Dimensity 6020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 700 vs Dimensity 6020 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 700 21
Dimensity 6020 21
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 700 14
Dimensity 6020 15
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 700 75
Dimensity 6020 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 700 37
Dimensity 6020 37
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 6020

  • Dimensity 6020 has 11.02% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 700 (374 K vs 337 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 700 544
Dimensity 6020 569

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 700 1884
Dimensity 6020 1728

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 700 101.85
Dimensity 6020

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 700 15
Dimensity 6020

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 700 32.9
Dimensity 6020

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 700 27.9
Dimensity 6020

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 700 14.55
Dimensity 6020

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 700 2.1
Dimensity 6020

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 700 543.4
Dimensity 6020

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 6 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 90Hz Full HD+ @120Hz/90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display QHD @ 60Hz -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units 32 32
  • FLOPS 243 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

memory-frequency

Memory frequency

2133 MHz
memory-frequency

Memory frequency

2133 MHz
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

17.07 Gbit/s
memory-frequency

Max bandwidth

17.07 Gbit/s
memory-frequency

Max Size

12 GB
memory-frequency

Max Size

12 GB

  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2 x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

4G Speed
  • 1200 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 211 Mbps
    Upload Speed
  • N/A
    Download Speed
  • N/A
    Upload Speed
5G Speed
  • 2770 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • 500 Mbps
    Upload Speed
  • 2770 Mbps
    Download Speed
  • -
    Upload Speed

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 Yes
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 700

CPU
21%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Mediatek Dimensity 6020

CPU
21%
GPU
15%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote