Overview - Dimensity 700 Vs Dimensity 800U

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 700 vs Dimensity 800U SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 700 21
Dimensity 800U 21
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 700 14
Dimensity 800U 16
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 700 75
Dimensity 800U 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 700 37
Dimensity 800U 37
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 700 Dimensity 800U
CPU 98632 113735
GPU 71777 104873
Memory 72555 67803
UX 93594 116075
Total score 336558 402486
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 700

  • Dimensity 700 has 11.76% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 800U (950 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 700 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 800U.

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 800U

  • Dimensity 800U has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 700 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 800U has 19.59% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 700 (402 K vs 337 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 700 544
Dimensity 800U 594

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 700 1884
Dimensity 800U 1683

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 700 101.85
Dimensity 800U 105.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 700 15
Dimensity 800U 15.5

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 700 32.9
Dimensity 800U 33.8

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 700 27.9
Dimensity 800U 28.6

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 700 14.55
Dimensity 800U 14.4

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 700 2.1
Dimensity 800U 2.08

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 700 543.4
Dimensity 800U 534.9

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 6 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 9 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 90Hz Full HD+ @ 120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display QHD @ 60Hz -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MC3
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 850 MHz
  • Execution units 2 3
  • Shading units 32 48
  • FLOPS 243 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 12 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2 x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 700

CPU
21%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Mediatek Dimensity 800U

CPU
21%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote