Overview - Dimensity 700 Vs Dimensity 820

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 700 vs Dimensity 820 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 700 21
Dimensity 820 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 700 14
Dimensity 820 20
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 700 75
Dimensity 820 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 700 37
Dimensity 820 41
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 700 Dimensity 820
CPU 98632 125662
GPU 71777 125708
Memory 72555 77949
UX 93594 106547
Total score 336558 435866
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 700

  • Dimensity 700 has 5.56% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 820 (950 vs 900 MHz).

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 820

  • Dimensity 820 has 18.18% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 700 (2600 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 820 has 29.51% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 700 (436 K vs 337 K ).
  • Dimensity 820 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 700.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 700 544
Dimensity 820 646

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 700 1884
Dimensity 820 2599

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 700 101.85
Dimensity 820 142.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 700 15
Dimensity 820 22.4

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 700 32.9
Dimensity 820 41.2

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 700 27.9
Dimensity 820 31.3

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 700 14.55
Dimensity 820 21.3

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 700 2.1
Dimensity 820 2.94

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 700 543.4
Dimensity 820 759

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 6 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 90Hz Full HD+ @ 120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display QHD @ 60Hz -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR, HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.3-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MC5
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall
  • GPU frequency 950 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 2 5
  • Shading units 32 80
  • FLOPS 243 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 12 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2 x 16 Bit 1x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 3.0
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 700

CPU
21%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Mediatek Dimensity 820

CPU
27%
GPU
20%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote