60

Points
Google Tensor G3
Overview - Dimensity 7020 Vs Tensor G3

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7020 vs Tensor G3 SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 9-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7020 28
Tensor G3 50
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7020 18
Tensor G3 45
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7020 79
Tensor G3 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7020 42
Tensor G3 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7020 Tensor G3
CPU 152839 281756
GPU 81155 364449
Memory 118550 148341
UX 124104 181913
Total score 476648 976459
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 7020

  • Dimensity 7020 has 1.12% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor G3 (900 vs 890 MHz).

Pros of Google Tensor G3

  • Tensor G3 has 32.27% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 7020 (2910 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 31.25% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 7020 (4200 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 7020 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Tensor G3 has 104.86% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7020 (976 K vs 477 K ).
  • Tensor G3 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 7020.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7020 897
Tensor G3 1626

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7020 2282
Tensor G3 3598

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A /10
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+@120Hz 4K
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

54% /10
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

72% /10
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

49% /10
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

42% /10
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
    4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 9
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G715 MP7
  • Architecture PowerVR IMG GPU Valhall 4th gen
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 890 MHz
  • Execution units 8 7
  • Shading units 18 192
  • FLOPS 259.2 Gigaflops 2415.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
  • OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 64 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 (Dual lane) UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300i
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps 7300 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps 3700 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 7020

CPU
28%
GPU
18%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Google Tensor G3

CPU
50%
GPU
45%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote