Menu

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7020

Dimensity 7020

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8300

Dimensity 8300
Overview - Dimensity 7020 Vs Dimensity 8300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7020 vs Dimensity 8300 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7020 30
Dimensity 8300 57
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7020 19
Dimensity 8300 58
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7020 79
Dimensity 8300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7020 43
Dimensity 8300 67
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7020 Dimensity 8300
CPU 152839 282796
GPU 81155 542690
Memory 118550 328720
UX 124104 249840
Total score 476648 1404046
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8300

  • Dimensity 8300 has 52.27% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 7020 (3350 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 55.56% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 7020 (1400 vs 900 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 7020 (4266 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 7020 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8300 has 194.57% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7020 (1,404 K vs 477 K ).
  • Dimensity 8300 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 7020.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7020 897
Dimensity 8300 1512

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7020 2282
Dimensity 8300 4886

3DMark

0%
Dimensity 7020
Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A
Dimensity 8300
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+@120Hz WQHD+ @ 120Hz, FHD+ @ 180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

89%
Turbo Clock Speed

3350 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

2200 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.35 GHz – Cortex-A715
    3x 3.2 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name IMG BXM-8-256 Mali-G615 MP6
  • Architecture PowerVR IMG GPU Valhall 4rd gen
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 1400 MHz
  • Execution units 8 6
  • Shading units 18 -
  • FLOPS 259.2 Gigaflops -
  • Vulkan version 1.3 1.3
  • OpenCL version 3.0 2.0
  • DirectX version - -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 4266 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 68.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes MediaTek APU 780
  • Storage type UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1 (Dual lane) UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 108MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 -
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 7020

MediaTek Dimensity 7020
CPU
30%
GPU
19%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 8300

MediaTek Dimensity 8300
CPU
57%
GPU
58%
Memory
50%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote