Overview - Dimensity 7050 Vs Apple A18 Pro

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7050 vs Apple A18 Pro SoCs by Mediatek and Apple respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 6-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7050 24
Apple A18 Pro 87
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7050 18
Apple A18 Pro 94
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7050 79
Apple A18 Pro 89
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7050 40
Apple A18 Pro 90
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7050 Apple A18 Pro
CPU 144109 475293
GPU 140847 719585
Memory 126627 259838
UX 139513 385136
Total score 551096 1839852
AnTuTu results from iOS and Android are not directly comparable! They won't affect Tenzys Tech scores.
Key Differences

Pros of Apple A18 Pro

  • Apple A18 Pro has 86.25% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 7050 (1490 vs 800 MHz).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 17.19% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 7050 (3750 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 50% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 7050 (3 vs 6 nm).
  • Apple A18 Pro has 233.85% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7050 (1,840 K vs 551 K ).
  • Apple A18 Pro has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 7050.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7050 832
Apple A18 Pro 3342

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7050 2328
Apple A18 Pro 8147

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test -
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @120 Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

64%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

100%
Base Frequency

4050 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 4.05 GHz – Everest
    4x 2.42 GHz – Sawtooth
  • Cores 8 6
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - 16 MB
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 3 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 4 W 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G68 MC4 Apple A18 Pro GPU
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Apple Bionic GPU
  • GPU frequency 800 MHz 1490 MHz
  • Execution units 4 -
  • Shading units 64 128
  • FLOPS 686 Gigaflops 2289 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 3200 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth - 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Neural Engine
  • Storage type UFS 2.1, UFS 2.2, UFS 3.0, UFS 3.1 NVMe
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 48MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP8, VP9, Motion JPEG
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AAX, AAX+, AC-3, AIFF, CAF, E-AC-3, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Snapdragon X75
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps 10000 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - 3500 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps 3500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - 1500 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 7050

CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Apple A18 Pro

CPU
87%
GPU
94%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
89%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote