78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 720

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Dimensity 720 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 720 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 720 20
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 720 14
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 720 75
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 720 36
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 720 Exynos 850
CPU 94857 47291
GPU 73751 21386
Memory 64277 40704
UX 61339 22040
Total score 294224 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 720

  • Dimensity 720 has 3.66% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (850 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 720 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 720 has 12.5% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (7 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 720 has 123.88% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (294 K vs 131 K).
  • Dimensity 720 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 720 523
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 720 1707
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 720 98.5
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 720 14.3
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 720 31.3
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 720 27
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 720 14.9
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 720 2
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 720 510.9
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

Stability 97%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 90 Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10, HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

53%
Turbo Clock Speed

2000 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC3 Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture Valhall Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 820 MHz
  • Execution units 3 6
  • Shading units 48 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 12 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes No
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 720

CPU
20%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote