Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Dimensity 7200

78

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 9000

Dimensity 9000
Overview - Dimensity 7200 Vs Dimensity 9000

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7200 vs Dimensity 9000 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7200 31
Dimensity 9000 49
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7200 27
Dimensity 9000 46
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7200 86
Dimensity 9000 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7200 48
Dimensity 9000 60
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7200 Dimensity 9000
CPU 160410 254411
GPU 202112 384881
Memory 119625 180981
UX 144980 185288
Total score 627127 1005561
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 70.67% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 9000 (6400 vs 3750 MHz).

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9000

  • Dimensity 9000 has 8.93% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 7200 (3050 vs 2800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9000 has 60.34% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7200 (1,006 K vs 627 K ).
  • Dimensity 9000 Support 47.42% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 7200 (60 vs 40.7 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 889
Dimensity 9000 1275

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 2376
Dimensity 9000 4132

3DMark

21%
Dimensity 7200
Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
40%
Dimensity 9000
Stability 90%

Graphics test 47 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz WQHD+ @144Hz / Full HD+ @180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2560 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

81%
Turbo Clock Speed

3050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

82%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
     1x 3.05 GHz – Cortex-X2
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A710
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
  • L3 cache 4 MB 8 MB
  • Process 4 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G710 MP10
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency - 850 MHz
  • Execution units 4 10
  • Shading units 512 512
  • FLOPS - 1648 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3750 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 40.7 Gbit/s 60 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Mediatek APU 650 MediaTek APU 590
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2560 x 1440 3200 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 320MP, 3x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 2CC 5G Modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Mediatek Dimensity 7200
CPU
31%
GPU
27%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 9000

MediaTek Dimensity 9000
CPU
49%
GPU
46%
Memory
44%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote