78

Points
Mediatek Helio G90T
Overview - Dimensity 7200 Vs Helio G90T

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7200 vs Helio G90T SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7200 31
Helio G90T 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7200 27
Helio G90T 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7200 86
Helio G90T 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7200 48
Helio G90T 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7200 Helio G90T
CPU 160410 98285
GPU 202112 80267
Memory 119625 55541
UX 144980 55908
Total score 627127 290001
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 36.59% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G90T (2800 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Helio G90T (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 66.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G90T (4 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 116.25% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G90T (627 K vs 290 K).
  • Dimensity 7200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G90T.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 889
Helio G90T 545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 2376
Helio G90T 1706

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 94.5

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 13.8

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 25.6

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 13.1

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 1.89

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 7200
Helio G90T 494.9

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
Stability 87%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2560 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G76 MC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency - 800 MHz
  • Execution units 4 4
  • Shading units 512 64
  • FLOPS - 184 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 40.7 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Mediatek APU 650 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2560 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 2CC 5G Modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

CPU
31%
GPU
27%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Helio G90T

CPU
20%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote