Overview - Dimensity 7200 Vs Exynos 1280

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7200 vs Exynos 1280 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7200 31
Exynos 1280 24
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7200 27
Exynos 1280 18
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7200 86
Exynos 1280 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7200 48
Exynos 1280 41
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7200 Exynos 1280
CPU 160410 121972
GPU 202112 104889
Memory 119625 77341
UX 144980 106223
Total score 627127 410425
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1280 (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1280 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 1280 (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 52.80% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1280 (627 K vs 410 K).
  • Dimensity 7200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1280.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 889
Exynos 1280 733

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 2376
Exynos 1280 1832

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 116.6

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 13.5

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 33.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 29.3

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 13.1

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 1.97

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 7200
Exynos 1280 556.4

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz Full HD+ @120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2560 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

74%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
    2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.3-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G68 MP4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency - 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 4 4
  • Shading units 512 48
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 40.7 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Mediatek APU 650 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2560 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 2CC 5G Modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

CPU
31%
GPU
27%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Samsung Exynos 1280

CPU
24%
GPU
18%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote