Menu

47

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Dimensity 7200

44

Points
Samsung Exynos 1380

Exynos 1380
Overview - Dimensity 7200 Vs Exynos 1380

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 7200 vs Exynos 1380 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 7200 29
Exynos 1380 29
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 7200 26
Exynos 1380 22
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 7200 86
Exynos 1380 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 7200 47
Exynos 1380 44
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 7200 Exynos 1380
CPU 160410 151675
GPU 202112 135413
Memory 119625 110932
UX 144980 124860
Total score 627127 522880
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 7200

  • Dimensity 7200 has 16.67% higher CPU clock speed than Exynos 1380 (2800 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Exynos 1380 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 1380 (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Dimensity 7200 has 19.94% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 1380 (627 K vs 523 K).
  • Dimensity 7200 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 1380.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 889
Exynos 1380 761

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 7200 2376
Exynos 1380 2696

3DMark

21%
Dimensity 7200
Stability %

Graphics test 24 FPS
N/A
Exynos 1380
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+@90 Hz, FHD+@144 Hz FHD+ @ 144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2560 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2800 MHz

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.8 GHz – Cortex-A715
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A510
     4x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv9-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC4 Mali-G68 MP5
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency - 950 MHz
  • Execution units 4 5
  • Shading units 512 -
  • FLOPS - 608 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 40.7 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Mediatek APU 650 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2560 x 1440 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8
  • Audio codecs AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem 2CC 5G Modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4700 Mbps 3670 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 1280 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, SBAS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 7200

Mediatek Dimensity 7200
CPU
29%
GPU
26%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Samsung Exynos 1380

Samsung Exynos 1380
CPU
29%
GPU
22%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote