Overview - Dimensity 800U Vs Dimensity 930

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 800U vs Dimensity 930 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 800U 18
Dimensity 930 24
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 800U 13
Dimensity 930 17
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 800U 75
Dimensity 930 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 800U 35
Dimensity 930 40
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 800U Dimensity 930
CPU 113735 137539
GPU 104873 130844
Memory 67803 97521
UX 116075 140904
Total score 402486 506808
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 800U

  • Dimensity 800U has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 930 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 930

  • Dimensity 930 has 14.29% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 800U (6 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 930 has 25.92% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 800U (507 K vs 402 K ).
  • Dimensity 930 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 800U.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 800U 594
Dimensity 930 780

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 800U 1683
Dimensity 930 2469

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 800U 105.3
Dimensity 930

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 800U 15.5
Dimensity 930

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 800U 33.8
Dimensity 930

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 800U 28.6
Dimensity 930

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 800U 14.4
Dimensity 930

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 800U 2.08
Dimensity 930

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 800U 534.9
Dimensity 930

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 9 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 120Hz Full HD+ @120 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC3 IMG BXM-8-256
  • Architecture Valhall PowerVR B-Series
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz -
  • Execution units 3 -
  • Shading units 48 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz -
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 12 GB -
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) Yes Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE. Cat.24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2300 Mbps 2770 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 1200 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed - -
  • 4G Upload Speed 211 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 800U

CPU
18%
GPU
13%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Mediatek Dimensity 930

CPU
24%
GPU
17%
Memory
0%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote