78

Points
Google Tensor G3
Overview - Dimensity 8050 Vs Tensor G3

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8050 vs Tensor G3 SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 9-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8050 39
Tensor G3 52
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8050 31
Tensor G3 46
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8050 79
Tensor G3 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8050 50
Tensor G3 61
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8050 Tensor G3
CPU 217200 281756
GPU 208098 364449
Memory 138670 148341
UX 138035 181913
Total score 702003 976459
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8050

  • Dimensity 8050 has 3.09% higher CPU clock speed than Tensor G3 (3000 vs 2910 MHz).

Pros of Google Tensor G3

  • Tensor G3 has 4.71% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 8050 (890 vs 850 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 96.91% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8050 (4200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Tensor G3 has 39.10% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8050 (976 K vs 702 K ).
  • Tensor G3 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8050.
  • Tensor G3 Support 87.68% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 8050 (64 vs 34.1 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8050 964
Tensor G3 1626

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8050 3261
Tensor G3 3598

3DMark

Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz 4K
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

77%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
    4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 9
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G715 MP7
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 4th gen
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 890 MHz
  • Execution units 9 7
  • Shading units 144 192
  • FLOPS 980 Gigaflops 2415.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 34.1 Gbit/s 64 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 570 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300i
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

CPU
39%
GPU
31%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Google Tensor G3

CPU
52%
GPU
46%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote