Overview - Dimensity 8050 Vs Dimensity 9300

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8050 vs Dimensity 9300 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8050 39
Dimensity 9300 92
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8050 31
Dimensity 9300 95
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8050 79
Dimensity 9300 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8050 50
Dimensity 9300 91
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8050 Dimensity 9300
CPU 217200 485064
GPU 208098 899463
Memory 138670 357691
UX 138035 312866
Total score 702003 2055084
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 9300

  • Dimensity 9300 has 8.33% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 8050 (3250 vs 3000 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 52.94% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 8050 (1300 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 125.04% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8050 (4800 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8050 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 9300 has 192.75% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8050 (2,055 K vs 702 K ).
  • Dimensity 9300 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8050.
  • Dimensity 9300 Support 125.22% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 8050 (76.8 vs 34.1 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8050 964
Dimensity 9300 2265

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8050 3261
Dimensity 9300 7995

3DMark

Stability 96%

Graphics test 27 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test 116 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display QHD+ @ 90 Hz, FHD+ @ 168 Hz 4k@120Hz, WQHD@180Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR - Yes
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

79%
Turbo Clock Speed

3000 MHz

86%
Turbo Clock Speed

3250 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3 GHz – Cortex-A78
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 3.25 GHz – Cortex-X4
    3x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-X4
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A720
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - 18 MB
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - 22.7 Billion
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G77 MC9 Mali-G720 Immortalis MP12
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 5th gen
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 1300 MHz
  • Execution units 9 12
  • Shading units 144 192
  • FLOPS 980 Gigaflops 5990.4 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4800 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 34.1 Gbit/s 76.8 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDRLPDDR5T
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 570 MediaTek APU 790
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 19 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.2 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

MediaTek Dimensity 8050

CPU
39%
GPU
31%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Dimensity 9300

CPU
92%
GPU
95%
Memory
56%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote