Menu

39

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810

Dimensity 810

42

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Dimensity 1050
Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Dimensity 1050

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 1050 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 22
Dimensity 1050 25
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Dimensity 1050 21
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Dimensity 1050 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Dimensity 1050 42
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Dimensity 1050
CPU 113696 137500
GPU 85477 159729
Memory 76385 96303
UX 105966 129591
Total score 381524 523123
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 1050

  • Dimensity 1050 has 4.17% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (2500 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 17.65% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (1000 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 50.02% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (3200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 1050 has 37.11% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (523 K vs 382 K ).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Dimensity 1050 745

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Dimensity 1050 2142

3DMark

6%
Dimensity 810
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
13%
Dimensity 1050
Stability 97%

Graphics test 15 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz FHD+ @144 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+ Adaptive, CUVA HDR-vivid, HLG and Dolby Vision
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G610 MC3
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 3
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 1000 MHz
  • Execution units 2 3
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 MediaTek APU 550
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.1, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 108MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps 4600 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 1200 Mbps 2770 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed 200 Mbps 1250 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

Mediatek Dimensity 810
CPU
22%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Dimensity 1050

Mediatek Dimensity 1050
CPU
25%
GPU
21%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote