Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Dimensity 700

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 700 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 23
Dimensity 700 21
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Dimensity 700 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Dimensity 700 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Dimensity 700 37
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Dimensity 700
CPU 113696 98632
GPU 85477 71777
Memory 76385 72555
UX 105966 93594
Total score 381524 336558
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 810

  • Dimensity 810 has 9.09% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 700 (2400 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 810 has 14.29% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 700 (6 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 810 has 13.36% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 700 (382 K vs 337 K).

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 700

  • Dimensity 700 has 11.76% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (950 vs 850 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Dimensity 700 544

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Dimensity 700 1884

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 101.85

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 15

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 32.9

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 27.9

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 14.55

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 2.1

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 810
Dimensity 700 543.4

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 6 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz FHD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - QHD @ 60Hz
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit Up to 10-bit
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 Rec2020
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

58%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 950 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units 32 32
  • FLOPS - 243 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2 x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Dimensity 700

CPU
21%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote