Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810

Dimensity 810

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8100

Dimensity 8100
Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Dimensity 8100

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Dimensity 8100 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 23
Dimensity 8100 42
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Dimensity 8100 38
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Dimensity 8100 82
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Dimensity 8100 54
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Dimensity 8100
CPU 113696 204875
GPU 85477 311503
Memory 76385 130636
UX 105966 161518
Total score 381524 808532
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100

  • Dimensity 8100 has 18.75% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (2850 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 7.29% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (912 vs 850 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 810 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 111.92% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (809 K vs 382 K ).
  • Dimensity 8100 Support 199.94% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 810 (51.2 vs 17.07 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Dimensity 8100 969

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Dimensity 8100 4081

3DMark

6%
Dimensity 810
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
29%
Dimensity 8100
Stability 94%

Graphics test 34 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 HDR10+
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB 4 MB
  • Process 6 nm 5 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 8 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G610 MC6
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall 2
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 912 MHz
  • Execution units 2 6
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 6400 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB -
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 APU 580 (multi-core)
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2960 x 1440
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - R16-ready 5G modem
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

Mediatek Dimensity 810
CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Dimensity 8100

Mediatek Dimensity 8100
CPU
42%
GPU
38%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote