Menu

37

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810

Dimensity 810

25

Points
MediaTek Helio G37

Helio G37
Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Helio G37

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Helio G37 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 19
Helio G37 12
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 13
Helio G37 7
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Helio G37 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 37
Helio G37 25
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Helio G37
CPU 113696 37521
GPU 85477 27112
Memory 76385 33579
UX 105966 40621
Total score 381524 138833
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 810

  • Dimensity 810 has 4.35% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G37 (2400 vs 2300 MHz).
  • Dimensity 810 has 25.00% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G37 (850 vs 680 MHz).
  • Dimensity 810 has 33.31% higher memory frequency than Helio G37 (2133 vs 1600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 810 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G37 (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 810 has 174.81% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G37 (382 K vs 139 K).
  • Dimensity 810 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G37 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Helio G37 914

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Helio G37 178

3DMark

6%
Dimensity 810
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
N/A
Helio G37
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz Full HD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2400 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

59%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

57%
Turbo Clock Speed

2300 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

44%
Base Frequency

1800 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     4x 2.3 GHz – Cortex-A53
    4x 1.8 GHz – Cortex-A53
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 2.2 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 IMG PowerVR GE8320
  • Architecture Valhall Rogue
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 680 MHz
  • Execution units 2 2
  • Shading units 32 64
  • FLOPS - 56 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 1.2
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1600 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 13.9 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 No
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2400 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 50MP, 2x 13MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 1K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 1080p at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 7
  • 5G support Yes No
  • 5G Download Speed 2770 Mbps -
  • 4G Download Speed 1200 Mbps 300 Mbps
  • 5G Upload Speed 1250 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed 200 Mbps 150 Mbps
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

Mediatek Dimensity 810
CPU
19%
GPU
13%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

MediaTek Helio G37

MediaTek Helio G37
CPU
12%
GPU
7%
Memory
19%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote