78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G90T
Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Helio G90T

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Helio G90T SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 23
Helio G90T 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Helio G90T 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Helio G90T 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Helio G90T 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Helio G90T
CPU 113696 98285
GPU 85477 80267
Memory 76385 55541
UX 105966 55908
Total score 381524 290001
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 810

  • Dimensity 810 has 17.07% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G90T (2400 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 810 has 6.25% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G90T (850 vs 800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 810 has 50% smaller sized transistor than Helio G90T (6 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 810 has 31.56% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G90T (382 K vs 290 K).
  • Dimensity 810 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G90T (1200 vs 600 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Helio G90T 545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Helio G90T 1706

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 94.5

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 13.8

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 25.6

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 13.1

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 1.89

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 810
Helio G90T 494.9

3DMark

Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Stability 87%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Mali-G76 MC4
  • Architecture Valhall Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 800 MHz
  • Execution units 2 4
  • Shading units 32 64
  • FLOPS - 184 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Mediatek Helio G90T

CPU
20%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote