Menu

78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 810

Dimensity 810

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 2400

Exynos 2400
Overview - Dimensity 810 Vs Exynos 2400

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Exynos 2400 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 10-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 810 23
Exynos 2400 88
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 810 16
Exynos 2400 76
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 810 79
Exynos 2400 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 810 39
Exynos 2400 83
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 810 Exynos 2400
CPU 113696 510545
GPU 85477 587630
Memory 76385 322132
UX 105966 260123
Total score 381524 1680430
Key Differences

Pros of Samsung Exynos 2400

  • Exynos 2400 has 33.75% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (3210 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 18.71% higher GPU clock speed than Dimensity 810 (1009 vs 850 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 96.91% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 810 (4200 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Exynos 2400 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 810 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Exynos 2400 has 340.45% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 810 (1,680 K vs 382 K ).
  • Exynos 2400 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 810.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 621
Exynos 2400 2193

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 810 1897
Exynos 2400 6895

3DMark

6%
Dimensity 810
Stability 99%

Graphics test 7 FPS
N/A
Exynos 2400
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display FHD+ @ 120Hz -
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 -
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10 -
  • Color Depth Up to 10-bit -
  • Color Gamut Rec2020 -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

85%
Turbo Clock Speed

3210 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     1x 3.21 GHz – Cortex-X4
    2x 2.9 GHz – Cortex-A720
    3x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A720
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A520
  • Cores 8 10
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9.2-A
  • L1 cache 512 KB -
  • L2 cache 1 MB -
  • L3 cache 2 MB -
  • Process 6 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count 12 Billion -
  • TDP 8 W -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC2 Samsung Xclipse 940
  • Architecture Valhall Samsung Xclipse
  • GPU frequency 850 MHz 1009 MHz
  • Execution units 2 -
  • Shading units 32 -
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 -
  • OpenCL version 2.0 -
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 24 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR5X
  • Bus 2x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Yes
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 3840 x 2400
  • Max camera resolution 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP 1x 320MP
  • Video capture 2K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 2K at 30FPS 8K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - Exynos 5300
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 5 7
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.4
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 810

Mediatek Dimensity 810
CPU
23%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%

Samsung Exynos 2400

Samsung Exynos 2400
CPU
88%
GPU
76%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote