Dimensity 810 Vs Exynos 850
We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 810 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.
Review
CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Battery life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Key Differences
Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 810
- Dimensity 810 has 3.66% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (850 vs 820 MHz).
- Dimensity 810 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
- Dimensity 810 has 25% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (6 vs 8 nm).
- Dimensity 810 has 190.31% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (382 K vs 131 K).
- Dimensity 810 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks
Performance tests in popular benchmarksAnTuTu 9
| CPU | 113696 | 47291 |
| GPU | 85477 | 21386 |
| Memory | 76385 | 40704 |
| UX | 105966 | 22040 |
| Total score | 381524 | 131421 |
GeekBench 5
Single-Core Score
Multi-Core Score
| Image compression | - | 74.3 Mpixels/s |
| Face detection | - | 10.4 images/s |
| Speech recognition | - | 16.7 words/s |
| Machine learning | - | 12.4 images/s |
| Camera shooting | - | 5.29 images/s |
| HTML 5 | - | 1.38 Mnodes/s |
| SQLite | - | 356.2 Mnodes/s |
3DMark
10%
Mediatek 8104%
Exynos 850Score: 1232
| Stability | 99% | 98% |
| Graphics test | 7 FPS | 3 FPS |
| Score | 1232 | 505 |
Specifications
Full list of technical specifications of Mediatek Dimensity 810 and Samsung Exynos 850Display
| Max On-Device Display | FHD+ @ 120Hz | Full HD+ |
| Max On-Display Resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max External Display | - | - |
| HDR | HDR10 | - |
| Color Depth | Up to 10-bit | - |
| Color Gamut | Rec2020 | - |
CPU
63%
Mediatek 8100%
Exynos 850
Processor Speed (Frequency)
| Architecture |
2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76 6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55 |
| Cores | 8 | 8 |
| Base Frequency | 2000 MHz | 2000 MHz |
| Turbo Frequency | 2400 MHz | - |
| Instruction set | ARMv8.2-A | ARMv8.2-A |
| L1 cache | 512 KB | - |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | - |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | - |
| Process | 6 nm | 8 nm |
| Transistor count | 12 Billion | - |
| TDP | 8 W | 3 W |
Graphics
| GPU name | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G52 MP1 |
| Architecture | Valhall | Bifrost |
| GPU frequency | 850 MHz | 820 MHz |
| Execution units | 2 | 6 |
| Shading units | 32 | 96 |
| FLOPS | - | 126 Gigaflops |
| Vulkan version | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenCL version | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| DirectX version | 12 | 12 |
Memory
| Memory type | LPDDR4X | LPDDR4X |
| Memory frequency | 2133 MHz | 1866 MHz |
| Bus | 2x 16 Bit | 2x 16 Bit |
| Max bandwidth | 17.07 Gbit/s | - |
| Max size | 16 GB | 8 GB |
Multimedia (ISP)
| Neural processor (NPU) | MediaTek APU 3.0 | No |
| Storage type | UFS 2.2 | eMMC 5.1 |
| Max display resolution | 2520 x 1080 | 2520 x 1080 |
| Max camera resolution | 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP | 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP |
| Video capture | 2K at 30FPS | 1K at 60FPS |
| Video playback | 2K at 30FPS | 1080p at 60FPS |
| Video codecs | H.264, H.265, VP9 | H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9 |
| Audio codecs | AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC | AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV |
Connectivity
Download Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
Upload Speed
4G (MB/s)
5G (MB/s)
| Modem | - | - |
| 4G support | LTE Cat. 18 | LTE Cat. 13 |
| 5G support | Yes | No |
| Peak Download speed | Up to 2770 Mbps | - |
| Peak Upload speed | Up to 1250 Mbps | - |
| Wi-Fi | 5 | 5 |
| Bluetooth | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Navigation | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC | GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo |
Info
| Announced Date | August 2021 | May 2020 |
| Class | Mid-range | Low end |
| Model number | MT6833V | S5E3830 |
| Official page | Dimensity 810 official site | Exynos 850 official site |
Mediatek Dimensity 810
35.75
Review By TenzysTech
Samsung Exynos 850
21.5
Review By TenzysTech
