78

Points
Google Tensor G3
Overview - Dimensity 8100 Vs Tensor G3

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8100 vs Tensor G3 SoCs by Mediatek and Google respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core and 9-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8100 42
Tensor G3 52
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8100 38
Tensor G3 46
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8100 82
Tensor G3 86
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8100 54
Tensor G3 61
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8100 Tensor G3
CPU 204875 281756
GPU 311503 364449
Memory 130636 148341
UX 161518 181913
Total score 808532 976459
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100

  • Dimensity 8100 has 2.47% higher GPU clock speed than Tensor G3 (912 vs 890 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 52.38% higher memory frequency than Tensor G3 (6400 vs 4200 MHz).

Pros of Google Tensor G3

  • Tensor G3 has 2.11% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 8100 (2910 vs 2850 MHz).
  • Tensor G3 has 20% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8100 (4 vs 5 nm).
  • Tensor G3 has 20.77% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8100 (976 K vs 809 K ).
  • Tensor G3 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8100.
  • Tensor G3 Support 25.00% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 8100 (64 vs 51.2 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 969
Tensor G3 1626

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 4081
Tensor G3 3598

3DMark

Stability 94%

Graphics test 34 FPS
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz 4K
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

2910 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

77%
Base Frequency

1700 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    1x 2.91 GHz – Cortex-X3
    4x 2.37 GHz – Cortex-A715
    4x 1.7 GHz – Cortex-A510
  • Cores 8 9
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv9-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 5 nm 4 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 8 W 6 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G715 MP7
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall 4th gen
  • GPU frequency 912 MHz 890 MHz
  • Execution units 6 7
  • Shading units - 192
  • FLOPS - 2415.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 4200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 64 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) APU 580 (multi-core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1, UFS 4.0
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 3840 x 2160
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 200MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 8K at 30FPS, 4K at 120FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem R16-ready 5G modem Exynos 5300i
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 24
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6 7
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.3
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8100

CPU
42%
GPU
38%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Google Tensor G3

CPU
52%
GPU
46%
Memory
49%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote