Menu

53

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8100

Dimensity 8100

47

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 8020

Dimensity 8020
Overview - Dimensity 8100 Vs Dimensity 8020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8100 vs Dimensity 8020 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8100 40
Dimensity 8020 33
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8100 37
Dimensity 8020 30
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8100 82
Dimensity 8020 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8100 53
Dimensity 8020 47
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8100 Dimensity 8020
CPU 204875 169130
GPU 311503 238983
Memory 130636 130727
UX 161518 148460
Total score 808532 687300
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100

  • Dimensity 8100 has 9.62% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 8020 (2850 vs 2600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 8020 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 16.67% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 8020 (5 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 17.64% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 8020 (809 K vs 687 K).
  • Dimensity 8100 has latest instruction set, hence better than Dimensity 8020.
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 969
Dimensity 8020 826

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 4081
Dimensity 8020 3315

3DMark

29%
Dimensity 8100
Stability 94%

Graphics test 34 FPS
22%
Dimensity 8020
Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz Full HD+ @144 Hz, QHD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

71%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

64%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
     4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A -
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 5 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 8 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency 912 MHz -
  • Execution units 6 9
  • Shading units - 144
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) APU 580 (multi-core) MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem R16-ready 5G modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4700 Mbps 4700 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed - 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6 6
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8100

Mediatek Dimensity 8100
CPU
40%
GPU
37%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

MediaTek Dimensity 8020

MediaTek Dimensity 8020
CPU
33%
GPU
30%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote