78

Points
Mediatek Helio G90T
Overview - Dimensity 8100 Vs Helio G90T

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8100 vs Helio G90T SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8100 42
Helio G90T 20
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8100 38
Helio G90T 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8100 82
Helio G90T 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8100 54
Helio G90T 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8100 Helio G90T
CPU 204875 98285
GPU 311503 80267
Memory 130636 55541
UX 161518 55908
Total score 808532 290001
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8100

  • Dimensity 8100 has 39.02% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G90T (2850 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 14.00% higher GPU clock speed than Helio G90T (912 vs 800 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Helio G90T (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 58.33% smaller sized transistor than Helio G90T (5 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 8100 has 178.80% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G90T (809 K vs 290 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 969
Helio G90T 545

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8100 4081
Helio G90T 1706

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 94.5

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 13.8

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 25.6

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 13.1

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 1.89

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8100
Helio G90T 494.9

3DMark

Stability 94%

Graphics test 34 FPS
Stability 87%

Graphics test 7 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display WQHD+ @120Hz / Full HD+ @168Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

75%
Turbo Clock Speed

2850 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.85 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.2-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 5 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 8 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G76 MC4
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 912 MHz 800 MHz
  • Execution units 6 4
  • Shading units - 64
  • FLOPS - 184 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size - 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 32 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) APU 580 (multi-core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 200MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem R16-ready 5G modem -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 6 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8100

CPU
42%
GPU
38%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
82%

Mediatek Helio G90T

CPU
20%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote