Overview - Dimensity 820 Vs Dimensity 8020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 820 vs Dimensity 8020 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 820 22
Dimensity 8020 29
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 820 16
Dimensity 8020 24
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 820 75
Dimensity 8020 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 820 38
Dimensity 8020 44
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 820 Dimensity 8020
CPU 125662 169130
GPU 125708 238983
Memory 77949 130727
UX 106547 148460
Total score 435866 687300
Key Differences

Pros of MediaTek Dimensity 8020

  • Dimensity 8020 has 14.29% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 820 (6 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 8020 has 57.69% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 820 (687 K vs 436 K ).
  • Dimensity 8020 Support 99.77% higher memory bandwidth than Dimensity 820 (34.1 vs 17.07 GB/s).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 820 646
Dimensity 8020 826

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 820 2599
Dimensity 8020 3315

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 820 142.3
Dimensity 8020

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 820 22.4
Dimensity 8020

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 820 41.2
Dimensity 8020

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 820 31.3
Dimensity 8020

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 820 21.3
Dimensity 8020

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 820 2.94
Dimensity 8020

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 820 759
Dimensity 8020

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability 99%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 120Hz Full HD+ @144 Hz, QHD+ @90 Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR, HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

64%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

64%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A -
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 4 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC5 Mali-G77 MC9
  • Architecture Valhall Valhall
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz -
  • Execution units 5 9
  • Shading units 80 144
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s 34.1 Gbit/s
  • Max Size 16 GB 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 1x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 MediaTek APU 570
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP 1x 108MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 21
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4700 Mbps 4700 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed 1200 Mbps -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps 2500 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed 211 Mbps -
  • Wi-Fi 5 6
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 820

CPU
22%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

MediaTek Dimensity 8020

CPU
29%
GPU
24%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote