78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 820

78

Points
Mediatek Helio G95
Overview - Dimensity 820 Vs Helio G95

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 820 vs Helio G95 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 820 27
Helio G95 19
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 820 20
Helio G95 14
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 820 75
Helio G95 57
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 820 41
Helio G95 30
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 820 Helio G95
CPU 125662 91718
GPU 125708 91234
Memory 77949 58340
UX 106547 59442
Total score 435866 300734
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 820

  • Dimensity 820 has 26.83% higher CPU clock speed than Helio G95 (2600 vs 2050 MHz).
  • Dimensity 820 has 41.67% smaller sized transistor than Helio G95 (7 vs 12 nm).
  • Dimensity 820 has 44.93% better AnTuTu 9 score than Helio G95 (436 K vs 301 K).
  • Dimensity 820 has latest instruction set, hence better than Helio G95.
  • Dimensity 820 Support 100.00% higher memory bandwidth than Helio G95 (1200 vs 600 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 820 646
Helio G95 529

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 820 2599
Helio G95 1680

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 820 142.3
Helio G95 96.2

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 820 22.4
Helio G95 14.6

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 820 41.2
Helio G95 31.1

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 820 31.3
Helio G95 26.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 820 21.3
Helio G95 13.8

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 820 2.94
Helio G95 1.97

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 820 759
Helio G95 444.9

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 8 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 120Hz Full HD+ @ 90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR, HDR10+ HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2050 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    2x 2.05 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 12 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 5 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC5 Mali-G76 3EEMC4
  • Architecture Valhall Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 900 MHz
  • Execution units 5 4
  • Shading units 80 64
  • FLOPS - 195.8 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 10 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 1x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 Da Vinci
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP 1x 64MP, 2x 24MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC, AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 12
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.0
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 820

CPU
27%
GPU
20%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Mediatek Helio G95

CPU
19%
GPU
14%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
57%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote