78

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 820

78

Points
Samsung Exynos 850
Overview - Dimensity 820 Vs Exynos 850

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 820 vs Exynos 850 SoCs by Mediatek and Samsung respectively. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 820 27
Exynos 850 9
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 820 20
Exynos 850 6
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 820 75
Exynos 850 71
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 820 41
Exynos 850 29
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 820 Exynos 850
CPU 125662 47291
GPU 125708 21386
Memory 77949 40704
UX 106547 22040
Total score 435866 131421
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 820

  • Dimensity 820 has 9.76% higher GPU clock speed than Exynos 850 (900 vs 820 MHz).
  • Dimensity 820 has 14.31% higher memory frequency than Exynos 850 (2133 vs 1866 MHz).
  • Dimensity 820 has 12.5% smaller sized transistor than Exynos 850 (7 vs 8 nm).
  • Dimensity 820 has 231.66% better AnTuTu 9 score than Exynos 850 (436 K vs 131 K).
  • Dimensity 820 has latest instruction set, hence better than Exynos 850.
  • Dimensity 820 Support 300.00% higher memory bandwidth than Exynos 850 (1200 vs 300 MHz).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 820 646
Exynos 850 150

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 820 2599
Exynos 850 937

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 820 142.3
Exynos 850 74.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 820 22.4
Exynos 850 10.4

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 820 41.2
Exynos 850 16.7

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 820 31.3
Exynos 850 12.4

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 820 21.3
Exynos 850 5.29

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 820 2.94
Exynos 850 1.38

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 820 759
Exynos 850 356.2

3DMark

Stability 98%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Stability 98%

Graphics test 3 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display Full HD+ @ 120Hz Full HD+
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR, HDR10+ -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

0%
Turbo Clock Speed

MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
    8x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set ARMv8.3-A ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache - -
  • Process 7 nm 8 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP 10 W 3 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G57 MC5 Mali-G52 MP1
  • Architecture Valhall Bifrost
  • GPU frequency 900 MHz 820 MHz
  • Execution units 5 6
  • Shading units 80 96
  • FLOPS - 126 Gigaflops
  • Vulkan version 1.1 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 2133 MHz 1866 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 17.07 Gbit/s -
  • Max Size 16 GB 8 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR4X LPDDR4X
  • Bus 1x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 3.0 No
  • Storage type UFS 2.2 eMMC 5.1
  • Max display resolution 2520 x 1080 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP 1x 48MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 30FPS 1K at 60FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 30FPS 1080p at 60FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP8, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 18 LTE Cat. 13
  • 5G support Yes No
  • Wi-Fi 5 5
  • Bluetooth 5.1 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 820

CPU
27%
GPU
20%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%

Samsung Exynos 850

CPU
9%
GPU
6%
Memory
22%
Energy efficiency and battery life
71%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote