Menu

51

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Dimensity 8200

35

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 6020

Dimensity 6020
Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Dimensity 6020

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Dimensity 6020 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 35
Dimensity 6020 17
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 31
Dimensity 6020 12
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Dimensity 6020 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 51
Dimensity 6020 35
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Dimensity 6020
CPU 210639 105422
GPU 339646 84018
Memory 139322 82373
UX 160894 101844
Total score 850501 373657
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 40.91% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 6020 (3100 vs 2200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 6020 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 42.86% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 6020 (4 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 127.62% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 6020 (851 K vs 374 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Dimensity 6020 569

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Dimensity 6020 1728

3DMark

0%
Dimensity 8200
Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A
Dimensity 6020
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+ @120Hz/90Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support -
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

54%
Turbo Clock Speed

2200 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
     2x 2.2 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MC2
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency - 950 MHz
  • Execution units 6 2
  • Shading units - 32
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 64MP, 2x 16MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 Yes
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4700 Mbps 2770 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps -
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Mediatek Dimensity 8200
CPU
35%
GPU
31%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 6020

Mediatek Dimensity 6020
CPU
17%
GPU
12%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote