Menu

55

Points
Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Dimensity 8200

43

Points
MediaTek Dimensity 7025

Dimensity 7025
Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Dimensity 7025

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Dimensity 7025 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 41
Dimensity 7025 31
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 39
Dimensity 7025 20
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Dimensity 7025 79
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 55
Dimensity 7025 43
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Dimensity 7025
CPU 210639 163789
GPU 339646 78876
Memory 139322 118764
UX 160894 135743
Total score 850501 497172
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 24.00% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 7025 (3100 vs 2500 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 100.00% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 7025 (6400 vs 3200 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 33.33% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 7025 (4 vs 6 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 71.07% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 7025 (851 K vs 497 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Dimensity 7025 1028

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Dimensity 7025 2430

3DMark

0%
Dimensity 8200
Stability %

Graphics test -
N/A
Dimensity 7025
Stability %

Graphics test -
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+ @120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

77%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

62%
Turbo Clock Speed

2500 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

49%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
     2x 2.5 GHz – Cortex-A78
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.2-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 6 nm
  • Transistor count - 10 Billion
  • TDP - -
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 IMG BXM-8-256
  • Architecture Valhall 2 PowerVR IMG GPU
  • GPU frequency - 950 MHz
  • Execution units 6 8
  • Shading units - 18
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.3
  • OpenCL version 2.0 3.0
  • DirectX version 12 -
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 3200 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 51.2 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR5
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 4x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2, UFS 3.1
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 200MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 2K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AIFF, CAF, MP3, MP4, WAV
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • 5G Download Speed 4700 Mbps 2770 Mbps
  • 4G Download Speed - -
  • 5G Upload Speed 2500 Mbps 1250 Mbps
  • 4G Upload Speed - -
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.2
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS, NAVIC
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

Mediatek Dimensity 8200
CPU
41%
GPU
39%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

MediaTek Dimensity 7025

MediaTek Dimensity 7025
CPU
31%
GPU
20%
Memory
38%
Energy efficiency and battery life
79%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote