Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Dimensity 800U

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Dimensity 800U SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Dimensity 800U 21
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Dimensity 800U 16
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Dimensity 800U 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Dimensity 800U 37
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Dimensity 800U
CPU 210639 113735
GPU 339646 104873
Memory 139322 67803
UX 160894 116075
Total score 850501 402486
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 29.17% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 800U (3100 vs 2400 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 800U (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 42.86% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 800U (4 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 111.31% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 800U (851 K vs 402 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Dimensity 800U 594

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Dimensity 800U 1683

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 105.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 15.5

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 33.8

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 28.6

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 14.4

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 2.08

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 800U 534.9

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 99%

Graphics test 9 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+ @ 120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

63%
Turbo Clock Speed

2400 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    2x 2.4 GHz – Cortex-A76
    6x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MC3
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency - 850 MHz
  • Execution units 6 3
  • Shading units - 48
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 12 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 2x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) Yes
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 64MP, 2x 20MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 800U

CPU
21%
GPU
16%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote