Overview - Dimensity 8200 Vs Dimensity 820

We have created a comprehensive comparison of the recently released Dimensity 8200 vs Dimensity 820 SoCs by Mediatek. We've now weighed the advantages and disadvantages of these 8-core CPUs on the basis of their Geekbench, Antutu and 3DMark benchmarks with their technical specifications.

Features

Review

CPU Performance
Single and multi-core processor tests
Dimensity 8200 43
Dimensity 820 27
Gaming Performance
GPU performance in games and OpenCL/Vulcan
Dimensity 8200 40
Dimensity 820 20
Battery Life
Efficiency of battery consumption
Dimensity 8200 86
Dimensity 820 75
Tenzys Tech Score
Overall chip score
Dimensity 8200 56
Dimensity 820 41
Benchmarks

AnTuTu 9

Dimensity 8200 Dimensity 820
CPU 210639 125662
GPU 339646 125708
Memory 139322 77949
UX 160894 106547
Total score 850501 435866
Key Differences

Pros of Mediatek Dimensity 8200

  • Dimensity 8200 has 19.23% higher CPU clock speed than Dimensity 820 (3100 vs 2600 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 200.05% higher memory frequency than Dimensity 820 (6400 vs 2133 MHz).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 42.86% smaller sized transistor than Dimensity 820 (4 vs 7 nm).
  • Dimensity 8200 has 95.13% better AnTuTu 9 score than Dimensity 820 (851 K vs 436 K).
Benchmarks

GeekBench 5

Single-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 1054
Dimensity 820 646

Multi-Core Score

icon
Dimensity 8200 4010
Dimensity 820 2599

Image compression

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 142.3

Face detection

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 22.4

Speech recognition

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 41.2

Machine learning

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 31.3

Camera shooting

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 21.3

HTML 5

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 2.94

SQLite

icon
Dimensity 8200
Dimensity 820 759

3DMark

Stability %

Graphics test -
Stability 98%

Graphics test 13 FPS
Full list of technical specifications

Display

  • Max On-Device Display 120Hz WQHD+ / 180Hz Full HD+ display support Full HD+ @ 120Hz
  • Max On-Display Resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max External Display - -
  • HDR HDR10+ Adaptive support HDR, HDR10+
  • Color Depth - -
  • Color Gamut - -
Full list of technical specifications

CPU

82%
Turbo Clock Speed

3100 MHz

69%
Turbo Clock Speed

2600 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

91%
Base Frequency

2000 MHz

  • Architecture 1x 3.1 GHz – Cortex A78
    3x 3 GHz – Cortex A78
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex A55
    4x 2.6 GHz – Cortex-A76
    4x 2 GHz – Cortex-A55
  • Cores 8 8
  • Instruction set - ARMv8.3-A
  • L1 cache - -
  • L2 cache - -
  • L3 cache 4 MB -
  • Process 4 nm 7 nm
  • Transistor count - -
  • TDP - 10 W
Full list of technical specifications

Graphics

  • GPU name Mali-G610 MC6 Mali-G57 MC5
  • Architecture Valhall 2 Valhall
  • GPU frequency - 900 MHz
  • Execution units 6 5
  • Shading units - 80
  • FLOPS - -
  • Vulkan version 1.2 1.1
  • OpenCL version 2.0 2.0
  • DirectX version 12 12
Full list of technical specifications

Memory

  • Memory frequency 6400 MHz 2133 MHz
  • Max bandwidth 51.2 Gbit/s 17.07 Gbit/s
  • Max Size - 16 GB
  • Memory type LPDDR5 LPDDR4X
  • Bus 4x 16 Bit 1x 16 Bit
Full list of technical specifications

Multimedia (ISP)

  • Neural processor (NPU) MediaTek APU 580(Multi-Core) MediaTek APU 3.0
  • Storage type UFS 3.1 UFS 2.2
  • Max display resolution 2960 x 1440 2520 x 1080
  • Max camera resolution 1x 320MP 1x 80MP, 2x 32MP
  • Video capture 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video playback 4K at 60FPS 4K at 30FPS
  • Video codecs H.264, H.265, AV1, VP9 H.264, H.265, VP9
  • Audio codecs AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC AAC LC, MP3, HE-AACv1, HE-AACv2, FLAC
Full list of technical specifications

Connectivity

  • Modem - -
  • 4G support LTE Cat. 21 LTE Cat. 18
  • 5G support Yes Yes
  • Wi-Fi 6E 5
  • Bluetooth 5.3 5.1
  • Navigation GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, QZSS
Full list of technical specifications

Info

Review

Review By TenzysTech

Mediatek Dimensity 8200

CPU
43%
GPU
40%
Memory
75%
Energy efficiency and battery life
86%

Mediatek Dimensity 820

CPU
27%
GPU
20%
Memory
25%
Energy efficiency and battery life
75%
Choose between two processors

Cast your vote